Friday, January 9, 2009

Nady or Swisher?

I think Yankees really commit to reduce their payroll to certain level which I agree with. Even though I don't think Yankees really need to deal one of outfielders because Swisher can play a lot of positions, I think Yankees will trade one of them if the right deal is out there. Because I think Yankees will and should get another veteran starter by trade or free agency, they probably want to free some payroll for that starter and use rest of budget to get a center fielder.

Based on what I heard from Yankees and what I saw from watching Yankees games, I think Yankees will deal Nady that I agree with.

Cashman already said Damon is not going anywhere because he is our lead off man. Matsui certainly can produce well when he is healthy. Not to mention it's very difficult to trade him based on his situation. Because of Japanese market, I don't think Yankees will be willing to risk the possibility of hurting Japanese market by trading Matsui. It's totally different story to trade him now instead of letting him walk at the end of his contract.

Swisher has a bad 2008 season which may result from luck, new team, new position and new batting order. I think he will be back to his 2006-2007 form. Not to mention Swisher is a patient switch hitter who can play a lot of positions and sign a team friendly contract. If Yankees let Damon and Matsui leave after 2009 season, it will be good to have him for one of spots. For me, I also like his personality. I think he will be good for Yankees.

On the other hand, Nady has a career year which will get paid much more in Arbitration. Don't forget Yankees try to control their payroll now. Of course, no one says Nady can't repeat that performance. Even if Nady's agent Boras let him hit the free agent market and sign with other teams, Yankees certainly can get draft pick for him if he perform well again in 2009 season. Don't forget Yankees still can sign him if he perform well again in 2009 season even if we trade him now. However, you always want to trade players when their values are high and buy players when their values are low. Based on what I saw from him and Swisher last year, I will bet on Swisher to perform better than Nady in 2009.

Of course, this all depends what kind of deals Yankees can get for them on trade market.

3 comments:

hopbitters said...

Aside from the first half of the season with Pittsburgh, Nady has been very consistent. His time with the Yankees was pretty much in line with his career averages. It's nothing spectacular, but solid.

Swisher has two average seasons, two strong seasons, and is coming off a real dog of a season. Overall, yeah, he averages out slightly better than Nady, but I think I'd rather stick with Nady. In a backup 1B/OF, I'd prefer consistently above average than maybe really good or maybe pretty bad.

MJB said...

As far as I'm concerned, either one can go (or stay, see below). I would like to see the 3 OF positions and DH manned by some combo of Damon, Melky, Gardner, and Matsui most of the time. That would leave, if I were Joe Girardi, Nady or Swisher on the bench unless one of those 4 really struggles (which, I admit, could be likely).

I think Nady is "better", but I think Swisher is more versatile. But again, neither would be getting much playing time if I had my say. I also know that the team appears to be down on Melky, Gardner, and Matsui for various reasons....so my scenario means nothing really, just dreams.

I think the Yankees should trade one if they can get a good starter in return. If, for example, Andy comes back, then I'd just keep the team as is. I think there should be room on the bench for 1 OF (i.e. Nady or whoever), 1 IF/OF utility (Swish), 1 C (Molina), and yet another IF utility (i.e.Ransom?). So I don't see the urgency in getting rid of a good player (likely Nady) just because his contract is up in a year and you want to 'get something' for him.

Jessica Lee said...

Of course,no one can know for sure how they will perform in 2009. If I have to deal one of them with the information and observation on hand, I will choose Nady. I really like Swisher and believe he will perform well if he is given enough playing time.

Of course, it all depends on what kind of package we can get for them. If the deal is not right, we really don't have to trade them. Having some depth and competition is not a bad thing at all.

By the way, I am not down on Matsui and Gardner at all. I may be down on Melky a little bit, but I still would give him one more chance before making my mind.